Common Core Standards are NOT curriculum
I am still surprised how many people mistakenly believe that the Common Core Standards and the State’s Common Core Curriculum are the same thing; they are not. The State has provided a curriculum guideline that may be followed to help children reach the Standards. Districts may or may not decide to use these curricula material; it is completely a local decision. Mineola has used a combination of State materials and our own teacher created materials.
I analogize the standards and curriculum to Equestrian show jumping. In show jumping the course is comprised of a set of obstacles that every horse must complete; the obstacles are not moved, lowered or changed to accommodate the horse. The common core standards were created with the same premise; a universal set of requirements that every student should meet. Obviously there are many other factors that determine whether those standards are met.
The most important ingredient to successful show jumping is the horse, followed quickly by the rider. Not every horse can be a show jumper. You wouldn’t ask a Clydesdale to jump fences (although some do in commercials). Grooming and training the right horse to jump is critical to successful completion of the course. In teaching, the horse is the curriculum, and the rider is the teacher.
Not only do you need the right horse you need significant time to develop the relationship between the rider and the horse. The most successful equestrians have a symbiotic relationship between rider and horse, each knowing how the other will react to a given obstacle. Teachers and the curriculum are no different. Teachers need to be comfortable in the content they are teaching- but more importantly need to know if the curriculum is meeting the standards.
Sometimes, no matter how well trained, a rider can be thrown by a horse. The horse believes that the obstacle is too hard to overcome. In these cases the rider’s patience and experience is most crucial. It is imperative that our curricula address the students that may have difficulty meeting the standards. In these cases our teachers are the most important. We need to develop appropriate materials that enable our student to progress and exceed the standards.
Starting now and continuing throughout the summer we will provide time and opportunities for teachers to work with his/her grade level curriculum. We are committed to making sure the materials we teach are engaging and appropriate. Most importantly we want our daily assessments to measure standards and track student growth in the standards. We have helped develop a software program that will allow us to do this electronically.
We are convinced that all our students can meet the standards. We will continue to modify and refine our curriculum to make sure our students are properly prepared. Our teachers and administrators will continue to be a vital part of developing curricula that is appropriate and challenging to help students meet and exceed the standards. I am confident that our teachers and administrators are up for this task.
You obviously missed the point. You are under the belief “that ALL children learn the same thing at the same time, regardless of their individual gifts or delays.” then whatever District you are referring to has not adopted or modified their curriculum. With the proper help and resources all children can meet the standards. The curriculum is the vehicle in which the standards are met. Local curriculum decisions are critical.
The equestrian analogy is quite misguided, and frankly a little naive. Not all horses are suited to show jumping. Some are better at dressage, some excel in rodeo or harness racing….etc. With Common Core, however, you force ALL children to learn the same things at the same time, regardless of their individual gifts or delays.
Of course, if you try to force ALL the horses to jump, some of them won’t make it. Some will fail. Some will break their legs and you’ll need to euthanize them. Hopefully you have a different solution in mind for the children who don’t fit into your “one size fits all” educational plan.
Percherons, Shires, Clydesdales, Irish Draft horses, Tennesee Walking Horses, Canadian Pacers, Miniature Horses, Mustangs or for more breeds look here.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_horse_breeds
The only horses who compete in jumping competitions are Hunters.
Under your analogy, Draft horses are too heavy, pacers would break their legs, miniature horses would be too small and mustangs could do it but only if they felt like it.
Your analogy comparing Equestrian show jumping to standards and curriculum is spot on! I have shared this with my principal and teachers and brought more clarity and they appreciated the comparison.
Thank you.